Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum processor
Yulin Wu, Wan-Su Bao, Sirui Cao, Fusheng Chen, Ming-Cheng Chen, Xiawei, Chen, Tung-Hsun Chung, Hui Deng, Yajie Du, Daojin Fan, Ming Gong, Cheng Guo,, Chu Guo, Shaojun Guo, Lianchen Han, Linyin Hong, He-Liang Huang, Yong-Heng, Huo, Liping Li, Na Li, Shaowei Li, Yuan Li

TL;DR
This paper reports the development of a 66-qubit superconducting quantum processor, Zuchongzhi, demonstrating quantum advantage by performing sampling tasks infeasible for classical supercomputers within a reasonable time.
Contribution
The paper introduces a large-scale, high-precision superconducting quantum processor capable of achieving quantum advantage through complex sampling tasks.
Findings
Sampling task took 1.2 hours on Zuchongzhi, while classical supercomputers would need at least 8 years.
System characterized by random quantum circuits sampling up to 56 qubits and 20 cycles.
Classical simulation cost is 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than previous 53-qubit systems.
Abstract
Scaling up to a large number of qubits with high-precision control is essential in the demonstrations of quantum computational advantage to exponentially outpace the classical hardware and algorithmic improvements. Here, we develop a two-dimensional programmable superconducting quantum processor, \textit{Zuchongzhi}, which is composed of 66 functional qubits in a tunable coupling architecture. To characterize the performance of the whole system, we perform random quantum circuits sampling for benchmarking, up to a system size of 56 qubits and 20 cycles. The computational cost of the classical simulation of this task is estimated to be 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than the previous work on 53-qubit Sycamore processor [Nature \textbf{574}, 505 (2019)]. We estimate that the sampling task finished by \textit{Zuchongzhi} in about 1.2 hours will take the most powerful supercomputer at least…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
