The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): Identification and characterization of the counterparts to the point-like sources
M. Salvato, J. Wolf, T. Dwelly, A. Georgakakis, M. Brusa, A. Merloni,, T. Liu, Y. Toba, K. Nandra, G. Lamer, J. Buchner, C. Schneider, S. Freund, A., Rau, A. Schwope, A. Nishizawa, M. Klein, R. Arcodia, J. Comparat, B., Musiimenta, T. Nagao, H. Brunner, A. Malyali, A. Finoguenov

TL;DR
This paper details the identification and characterization of X-ray source counterparts from the eROSITA eFEDS survey, providing a comprehensive multi-wavelength catalog with redshifts, crucial for understanding the X-ray emitting populations.
Contribution
It introduces a combined method for identifying counterparts to eROSITA X-ray sources and releases a large multi-wavelength catalog with redshifts, enhancing the understanding of X-ray source populations.
Findings
90.5% of sources have reliable counterparts
Over 24,700 sources with multi-wavelength properties and redshifts
High identification success rate in the eFEDS survey
Abstract
In November 2019, eROSITA on board of SRG observatory started to map the entire sky in X-rays. After the 4-year survey program, it will reach flux limits about 25 times deeper than ROSAT. During the SRG Performance Verification phase, eROSITA observed a contiguous 140 deg area of the sky down to the final depth of the eROSITA all-sky survey ("eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey": eFEDS), with the goal of obtaining a census of the X-ray emitting populations (stars, compact objects, galaxies, clusters of galaxies, AGN) that will be discovered over the entire sky. This paper presents the identification of the counterparts to the point-sources detected in eFEDS in the Main and Hard samples described in Brunner et al 2021, and their multi-wavelength properties, including redshift. For the identification of the counterparts we combined the results from two independent methods (NWAY…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
