The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS): Optical confirmation, redshifts, and properties of the cluster and group catalog
M. Klein, M. Oguri, J.J. Mohr, S. Grandis, V. Ghirardini, T. Liu, A., Liu, E. Bulbul, J. Wolf, J. Comparat, M. E. Ramos-Ceja, J. Buchner, I. Chiu,, N. Clerc, A. Merloni, H. Miyatake, S. Miyazaki, N. Okabe, N. Ota, F. Pacaud,, M. Salvato, S. P. Driver

TL;DR
This paper presents the optical confirmation, redshift determination, and property analysis of galaxy clusters from the eROSITA eFEDS survey, achieving a high-purity catalog with over 99% completeness and low contamination, using optical imaging and advanced confirmation tools.
Contribution
The study introduces a comprehensive optical follow-up method for X-ray detected galaxy clusters, achieving high confirmation accuracy and low contamination in the first large-scale optical validation of eROSITA clusters.
Findings
Confirmed 477 clusters with 6% residual contamination.
Achieved >99% completeness of true clusters in the candidate list.
Estimated full sample contamination at ~17%, consistent with simulations.
Abstract
The eROSITA Final Equatorial-Depth Survey (eFEDS), covering ~140 square degrees, was performed as part of the performance verification phase of the eROSITA telescope on board of the Russian-German satellite Spectrum-Roentgen-Gamma (SRG). In this paper we present the optical follow-up of 542 X-ray extent selected galaxy group and cluster candidates providing redshifts and cluster confirmation for the full sample. We use optical imaging data from the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program and from the Legacy Survey to run the cluster redshift and confirmation tool MCMF as well as the optical cluster finder CAMIRA at the location of the X-ray candidates. While providing redshift estimates for all 542 candidates, we construct an optically confirmed sample of 477 clusters and groups with a residual contamination of 6%. Of these, 470 (98.5%) are confirmed using MCMF and 7 systems are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
