Mapping the Likelihood of GW190521 with Diverse Mass and Spin Priors

TL;DR

This paper investigates how different uninformative priors on mass and spin affect the inferred properties of GW190521, revealing multiple plausible astrophysical scenarios and emphasizing the importance of prior choice in gravitational wave analysis.

Contribution

It systematically maps the likelihood of GW190521 under diverse priors, highlighting the impact of prior assumptions on the inferred black hole properties and astrophysical interpretations.

Findings

Likelihood peaks in multiple mass ratio regions.

Unequal-mass scenario avoids pair-instability mass gap.

Prior choices significantly influence parameter inference.

Abstract

We map the likelihood of GW190521, the heaviest detected binary black hole (BBH) merger, by sampling under different mass and spin priors designed to be uninformative. We find that a source-frame total mass of $\sim$$150 M_{\odot}$ is consistently supported, but posteriors in mass ratio and spin depend critically on the choice of priors. We confirm that the likelihood has a multi-modal structure with peaks in regions of mass ratio representing very different astrophysical scenarios. The unequal-mass region ($m_2 / m_1 < 0.3$) has an average likelihood $\sim$$e^6$ times larger than the equal-mass region and a maximum likelihood $\sim$$e^2$ larger. Using ensembles of samples across priors, we examine the implications of qualitatively different BBH sources that fit the data. We find that the equal-mass solution has poorly constrained spins and at least one black hole mass that is difficult to form via stellar collapse due to (pulsational) pair instability. The unequal-mass solution can avoid this mass gap entirely but requires a negative effective spin and a precessing primary. Both of these scenarios are more easily produced by dynamical formation channels than field binary co-evolution. Drawing representative samples from each region of the likelihood map, we find a sensitive comoving volume-time $\mathcal{O}(10)$ times larger in the mass gap region than the gap-avoiding region. Accounting for this distance effect, the likelihood still reverses the advantage to favor the gap-avoiding scenario by a factor of $\mathcal{O}(100)$ before including mass and spin priors. Posterior samplers can be driven away from this high-likelihood region by common prior choices meant to be uninformative, making GW190521 parameter inference sensitive to the choice of mass and spin priors. This may be a generic issue for similarly heavy events given current detector sensitivity and waveform degeneracies.