Distinguishing thixotropy from viscoelasticity
Mayank Agarwal, Shweta Sharma, V. Shankar, and Yogesh M. Joshi

TL;DR
This study evaluates existing methods to distinguish thixotropy from viscoelasticity in materials, proposing a new criterion based on step-strain or step-stress tests that effectively differentiates the two behaviors.
Contribution
It introduces a novel experimental criterion using step-strain or step-stress tests to reliably distinguish thixotropic from viscoelastic materials, validated through experiments and modeling.
Findings
Step-strain or step-stress tests after preshear effectively differentiate thixotropy from viscoelasticity.
Thixotropic materials show slowing relaxation dynamics with waiting time.
Viscoelastic materials exhibit a shift in relaxation modulus to lower values over time.
Abstract
Owing to nonlinear viscoelasticity, materials often show characteristic features that resemble those of thixotropy. This issue has been debated in the literature over the past several decades, and several experimental protocols have been proposed to distinguish thixotropy from viscoelasticity. In this work, we assess these protocols by carrying out experiments using polymer solutions, thixotropic clay dispersions, and modeling their behavior, respectively, using the FENE-P constitutive equation and a viscoelastic aging model. We find that the criteria proposed in the literature, such as a step down jump in the shear rate and shear startup at different waiting times elapsed since preshear, are inadequate to distinguish thixotropy from viscoelasticity. In marked contrast, we show that the application of step-strain or step-stress after cessation of the preshear serves as a useful…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
