What are the limits of universality?
Noah Halberstam, Tom Hutchcroft

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limits of universality in critical phenomena beyond Euclidean lattices, showing that critical exponents depend mainly on volume-growth dimension in certain graphs but not on fractal dimensions, challenging previous conjectures.
Contribution
It provides numerical evidence that universality extends to transitive graphs with polynomial volume growth but fails on fractals, clarifying the scope of universality in statistical mechanics models.
Findings
Critical exponents depend only on volume-growth dimension in certain graphs.
Universality does not hold on fractals with identical fractal dimensions.
Percolation exponents are consistent across different geometries with the same volume-growth dimension.
Abstract
It is a central prediction of renormalisation group theory that the critical behaviours of many statistical mechanics models on Euclidean lattices depend only on the dimension and not on the specific choice of lattice. We investigate the extent to which this universality continues to hold beyond the Euclidean setting, taking as case studies Bernoulli bond percolation and lattice trees. We present strong numerical evidence that the critical exponents governing these models on transitive graphs of polynomial volume growth depend only on the volume-growth dimension of the graph and not on any other large-scale features of the geometry. For example, our results strongly suggest that percolation, which has upper-critical dimension six, has the same critical exponents on the four-dimensional hypercubic lattice and the Heisenberg group despite the distinct large-scale geometries…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
