The Probabilistic Random Forest applied to the selection of quasar candidates in the QUBRICS Survey
Francesco Guarneri, Giorgio Calderone, Stefano Cristiani, Fabio, Fontanot, Konstantina Boutsia, Guido Cupani, Andrea Grazian, Valentina, D'Odorico

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Probabilistic Random Forest method for selecting high-redshift quasar candidates, improving accuracy by accounting for measurement errors, and demonstrates promising results on the QUBRICS survey dataset.
Contribution
The paper presents the novel application of Probabilistic Random Forests to quasar selection, enhancing classification robustness over traditional methods.
Findings
Achieved 84% completeness and 78% purity in candidate selection.
Successfully identified 29 high-redshift QSOs out of 41 spectroscopically observed.
Demonstrated promising performance of PRF in astrophysical classification tasks.
Abstract
The number of known, bright (), high-redshift () QSOs in the Southern Hemisphere is considerably lower than the corresponding number in the Northern Hemisphere due to the lack of multi-wavelength surveys at . Recent works, such as the QUBRICS survey, successfully identified new, high-redshift QSOs in the South by means of a machine learning approach applied on a large photometric dataset. Building on the success of QUBRICS, we present a new QSO selection method based on the Probabilistic Random Forest (PRF), an improvement of the classic Random Forest algorithm. The PRF takes into account measurement errors, treating input data as probability distribution functions: this allows us to obtain better accuracy and a robust predictive model. We applied the PRF to the same photometric dataset used in QUBRICS, based on the SkyMapper DR1, Gaia DR2, 2MASS, WISE and GALEX…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
