Combining Astrometry and Elemental Abundances: The Case of the Candidate Pre-Gaia Halo Moving Groups G03-37, G18-39, and G21-22
S.C. Schuler, J.J. Andrews, V.R. Clanzy II, M. Mourabit, J. Chanam\'e,, and M.A. Ag\"ueros

TL;DR
This study combines astrometric data and detailed chemical analysis to evaluate the nature of three candidate halo moving groups, revealing they are not genuine groups and highlighting the importance of integrated kinematic and chemical approaches.
Contribution
The paper introduces a Bayesian method for deriving stellar abundances and applies it to assess the authenticity of halo moving groups, demonstrating the effectiveness of combined chemical and kinematic analysis.
Findings
G21-22 stars are chemically heterogeneous.
The three groups are not genuine moving groups.
G21-22 may be linked to Gaia-Enceladus event.
Abstract
While most moving groups are young and nearby, a small number have been identified in the Galactic halo. Understanding the origin and evolution of these groups is an important piece of reconstructing the formation history of the halo. Here we report on our analysis of three putative halo moving groups: G03-37, G18-39, and G21-22. Based on Gaia EDR3 data, the stars associated with each group show some scatter in velocity (e.g., Toomre diagram) and integrals of motion (energy, angular momentum) spaces, counter to expectations of moving-group stars. We choose the best candidate of the three groups, G21-22, for follow-up chemical analysis based on high-resolution spectroscopy of six presumptive members. Using a new Python code that uses a Bayesian method to self-consistently propagate uncertainties from stellar atmosphere solutions in calculating individual abundances and spectral…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
