A comparison of exact and model exchange-correlation potentials for molecules
Bikash Kanungo, Paul M. Zimmerman, Vikram Gavini

TL;DR
This study computes exact exchange-correlation potentials for six molecules using inverse DFT and compares them with common model functionals, revealing significant discrepancies especially in strongly correlated cases, and highlighting the importance of exact conditions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison between exact and model XC potentials for molecules, emphasizing the need for improved functionals that incorporate non-local effects and satisfy exact conditions.
Findings
Model XC potentials have larger errors than densities, especially in strongly correlated systems.
SCAN0 shows the best agreement among tested functionals.
Errors in potentials are significantly larger than in densities.
Abstract
Accurate exchange-correlation (XC) potentials for 3-dimensional systems -- via solution of the \emph{inverse} density functional theory (DFT) problem -- are now available to test the quality of DFT approximations. Herein, the \emph{exact} XC potential for six molecules -- hydrogen molecule at three different bond-lengths, lithium hydride, water, and ortho-benzyne -- are computed using accurate ground-state densities from full configuration interaction (CI) calculations. These potentials are then compared to model XC potentials obtained from DFT calculations with commonly used non-local (B3LYP, HSE06, SCAN0, and M08-HX) and local/semi-local (SCAN, PBE, PW92) XC functionals. While relative errors in the ground-state densities from these models are order , much larger errors in the model XC potentials are found, , in both the …
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
