False perfection in machine prediction: Detecting and assessing circularity problems in machine learning
Michael Hagmann, Stefan Riezler

TL;DR
This paper discusses the issue of circularity in machine learning predictions, highlighting how it can lead to false perceptions of accuracy and proposing methods to detect and assess such problems.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for identifying and evaluating circularity issues in machine learning models, emphasizing the importance of validity and reliability.
Findings
Circularity can cause false confidence in model predictions
Detection methods can identify circularity problems
Assessment techniques improve model validity
Abstract
This paper is an excerpt of an early version of Chapter 2 of the book "Validity, Reliability, and Significance. Empirical Methods for NLP and Data Science", by Stefan Riezler and Michael Hagmann, published in December 2021 by Morgan & Claypool. Please see the book's homepage at https://www.morganclaypoolpublishers.com/catalog_Orig/product_info.php?products_id=1688 for a more recent and comprehensive discussion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsForecasting Techniques and Applications · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Statistical and Computational Modeling
