Understanding the Effects of Systematics in Exoplanetary Atmospheric Retrievals
Jegug Ih, Eliza M.-R. Kempton

TL;DR
This paper investigates how correlated noise and systematics affect exoplanet atmospheric retrievals, revealing biases and limitations in current methods, especially with different observational instruments.
Contribution
It demonstrates the impact of correlated noise on retrieval accuracy, highlighting the importance of accounting for systematics in exoplanet atmospheric analysis.
Findings
Correlated noise can cause overfitting and bias in atmospheric parameters.
Higher precision data may lead to larger errors due to correlated noise.
Distinguishing correlated noise is challenging with HST but possible with JWST.
Abstract
Retrieval of exoplanetary atmospheric properties from their transmission spectra commonly assumes that the errors in the data are Gaussian and independent. However, non-Gaussian noise can occur due to instrumental or stellar systematics and merging discrete datasets. We investigate the effect of correlated noise and constrain the potential biases incurred in the retrieved posteriors. We simulate multiple noise instances of synthetic data and perform retrievals to obtain statistics of goodness-of-retrieval for varying noise models. We find that correlated noise allows for overfitting the spectrum, thereby yielding better goodness-of-fit on average but degrading the overall accuracy of retrievals. In particular, correlated noise can manifest as an apparent non-Rayleigh slope in the optical range, leading to an incorrect estimate of cloud/haze parameters. We also find that higher precision…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
