Global 3D Radiation Hydrodynamic Simulations of Proto-Jupiter's Convective Envelope
Zhaohuan Zhu, Yan-Fei Jiang, Hans Baehr, Andrew N. Youdin, Philip J., Armitage, and Rebecca G. Martin

TL;DR
This study uses 3D radiation hydrodynamic simulations to explore how recycling flows affect the thermal structure and accretion timescales of proto-Jupiter's convective envelope, revealing limited thermal impact but significant mass exchange.
Contribution
It introduces a 3D simulation approach with updated opacity, compares isolated and embedded envelopes, and develops a modified 1D model that accurately reproduces 3D results, advancing understanding of giant planet formation.
Findings
Recycling penetrates only 0.1-0.2 planetary Hill radii in radiative envelopes.
Convective envelopes experience efficient recycling throughout, dredging up deeper layers.
Revised 1D model confirms shorter runaway accretion timescale, consistent with prior studies.
Abstract
The core accretion model of giant planet formation has been challenged by the discovery of recycling flows between the planetary envelope and the disc that can slow or stall envelope accretion. We carry out 3D radiation hydrodynamic simulations with an updated opacity compilation to model the proto-Jupiter's envelope. To isolate the 3D effects of convection and recycling, we simulate both isolated spherical envelopes and envelopes embedded in discs. The envelopes are heated at given rates to achieve steady states, enabling comparisons with 1D models. We vary envelope properties to obtain both radiative and convective solutions. Using a passive scalar, we observe significant mass recycling on the orbital timescale. For a radiative envelope, recycling can only penetrate from the disc surface until 0.1-0.2 planetary Hill radii, while for a convective envelope, the convective motion…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
