A systems framework for remedying dysfunction in U.S. democracy
Samuel S.-H. Wang, Jonathan Cervas, Bernard Grofman, Keena Lipsitz

TL;DR
This paper proposes a systems-level modeling framework to analyze and improve U.S. democracy by understanding complex interactions and emergent phenomena like polarization and anti-majoritarianism.
Contribution
It introduces a novel systems approach to model democratic processes, incorporating mechanisms like feedback and nonlinearities to evaluate reforms' effectiveness.
Findings
Analysis of polarization and anti-majoritarianism as emergent phenomena
Identification of how electoral rules contribute to undesirable outcomes
Framework for predicting reform impacts in changing political environments
Abstract
Democracy often fails to meet its ideals, and these failures may be made worse by electoral institutions. Unwanted outcomes include polarized institutions, unresponsive representatives, and the ability of a faction of voters to gain power at the expense of the majority. Various reforms have been proposed to address these problems, but their effectiveness is difficult to predict against a backdrop of complex interactions. Here we outline a path for systems-level modeling to help understand and optimize repairs to U.S. democracy. Following the tradition of engineering and biology, models of systems include mechanisms with dynamical properties that include nonlinearities and amplification (voting rules), positive feedback mechanisms (single-party control, gerrymandering), negative feedback (checks and balances), integration over time (lifetime judicial appointments), and low dimensionality…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
