Lifted Model Checking for Relational MDPs
Wen-Chi Yang, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Raskin, Luc De Raedt

TL;DR
This paper introduces pCTL-REBEL, a lifted model checking method for relational MDPs that leverages symmetries to verify properties efficiently, overcoming state explosion issues in propositional approaches.
Contribution
It extends REBEL to perform lifted pCTL model checking on relational MDPs, enabling scalable verification without grounding.
Findings
Lifted model checking improves scalability over propositional methods.
pCTL model checking is decidable for relational MDPs with bounded state size.
The implementation demonstrates practical efficiency gains.
Abstract
Probabilistic model checking has been developed for verifying systems that have stochastic and nondeterministic behavior. Given a probabilistic system, a probabilistic model checker takes a property and checks whether or not the property holds in that system. For this reason, probabilistic model checking provide rigorous guarantees. So far, however, probabilistic model checking has focused on propositional models where a state is represented by a symbol. On the other hand, it is commonly required to make relational abstractions in planning and reinforcement learning. Various frameworks handle relational domains, for instance, STRIPS planning and relational Markov Decision Processes. Using propositional model checking in relational settings requires one to ground the model, which leads to the well known state explosion problem and intractability. We present pCTL-REBEL, a lifted model…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsFormal Methods in Verification
