Galaxy properties of type 1 and 2 X-ray selected AGN and comparison among different classification criteria
G. Mountrichas, V. Buat, I. Georgantopoulos, G. Yang, V. A. Masoura,, M. Boquien, D. Burgarella

TL;DR
This study compares host galaxy properties of type 1 and 2 X-ray selected AGNs, demonstrating that SED fitting with X-CIGALE effectively classifies AGN types and reveals differences in host galaxy mass.
Contribution
The paper introduces a comprehensive analysis combining optical to far-infrared SED fitting with X-CIGALE to classify AGN types and compare their host galaxy properties, validating the method against spectroscopic classifications.
Findings
Type 2 AGNs reside in more massive galaxies than type 1s.
X-CIGALE accurately identifies AGN types based on SED fitting.
Optical/mid-IR colour criteria are less effective for low to moderate luminosity AGN identification.
Abstract
We present analyses of host galaxy properties of type 1 and type 2 X-ray selected AGNs in the XMM-XXL field, which have available optical spectroscopic classification. We model their optical to far-infrared spectral energy distributions (SEDs) using the X-CIGALE code. X-CIGALE allows the fitting of X-ray flux and accounts for the viewing angle of dusty torus and the attenuation from polar dust. By selecting matched type 1 and 2 subsamples in the X-ray luminosity and redshift parameter space, we find that both types live in galaxies with similar star formation. However, type 2 AGN tend to reside in more massive systems () compared to their type 1 counterparts (). In the second part of our analysis, we compare the spectroscopic classification with that from the SED fitting. X-CIGALE successfully identifies all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
