Expediting DECam Multimessenger Counterpart Searches with Convolutional Neural Networks
Adam Shandonay, Robert Morgan, Keith Bechtol, Clecio R. Bom, and Brian Nord, Alyssa Garcia, Ben Henghes, Kenneth Herner, Megan, Tabbutt, Antonella Palmese, Luidhy Santana-Silva, Marcelle, Soares-Santos, Mandeep S. S. Gill, Juan Garcia-Bellido

TL;DR
This paper introduces two convolutional neural networks that significantly reduce false positives and automate classification in optical difference imaging for multimessenger event follow-up, speeding up counterpart identification.
Contribution
The authors develop and validate CNN-based methods to improve false positive removal and source classification in difference imaging, reducing human inspection needs.
Findings
False detection accuracy of 92% with CNN
Reduces human inspection by 1.5 times alone
Reduces human inspection by 3.6 times with existing algorithms
Abstract
Searches for counterparts to multimessenger events with optical imagers use difference imaging to detect new transient sources. However, even with existing artifact detection algorithms, this process simultaneously returns several classes of false positives: false detections from poor quality image subtractions, false detections from low signal-to-noise images, and detections of pre-existing variable sources. Currently, human visual inspection to remove the false positives is a central part of multimessenger follow-up observations, but when next generation gravitational wave and neutrino detectors come online and increase the rate of multimessenger events, the visual inspection process will be prohibitively expensive. We approach this problem with two convolutional neural networks operating on the difference imaging outputs. The first network focuses on removing false detections and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
