Straightforward and accurate automatic auxiliary basis set generation for molecular calculations with atomic orbital basis sets
Susi Lehtola

TL;DR
This paper introduces a simple, stable, and automatic method for generating auxiliary basis sets for density fitting in quantum chemistry, applicable to various atomic basis functions, and demonstrates its effectiveness with Gaussian basis sets.
Contribution
The authors propose a novel automated auxiliary basis set generation scheme using pivoted Cholesky decomposition, applicable to any atomic basis type, improving accuracy and efficiency in quantum chemical calculations.
Findings
Negligible errors in Hartree-Fock and MP2 energies using the new scheme.
Effective with Gaussian basis sets of at least polarized triple-zeta quality.
Promising potential for application with Slater-type and numerical atomic orbitals.
Abstract
Density fitting (DF), also known as the resolution of the identity (RI), is a widely used technique in quantum chemical calculations with various types of atomic basis sets - Gaussian-type orbitals, Slater-type orbitals, as well as numerical atomic orbitals - to speed up density functional, Hartree-Fock, and post-Hartree-Fock calculations. Traditionally, custom auxiliary basis sets are hand-optimized for each orbital basis set; however, some automatic schemes have also been suggested. In this work, we propose a simple yet numerically stable automated scheme for forming auxiliary basis sets with the help of a pivoted Cholesky decomposition, which is applicable to any type of atomic basis function. We exemplify the scheme with proof-of-concept calculations with Gaussian basis sets and show that the proposed approach leads to negligible DF/RI errors in Hartree-Fock (HF) and second-order…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
