Pro or Anti? A Social Influence Model of Online Stance Flipping
Lynnette Hui Xian Ng, Kathleen Carley

TL;DR
This paper introduces a social influence model to predict stance flipping on Twitter regarding COVID-19 vaccines, considering innate beliefs and social influence, achieving high accuracy and revealing bot involvement in stance changes.
Contribution
It proposes a novel stance flipping prediction model incorporating endogenous and exogenous influences, with empirical validation on COVID-19 vaccine discussions.
Findings
Model achieves 86% accuracy in predicting stance flips.
Agents with more neighbors expressing opposite stances are more likely to flip.
Over half of the flip agents are bots requiring less influence to change stances.
Abstract
Social influence characterizes the change of an individual's stances in a complex social environment towards a topic. Two factors often govern the influence of stances in an online social network: endogenous influences driven by an individual's innate beliefs through the agent's past stances and exogenous influences formed by social network influence between users. Both endogenous and exogenous influences offer important cues to user susceptibility, thereby enhancing the predictive performance on stance changes or flipping. In this work, we propose a stance flipping prediction problem to identify Twitter agents that are susceptible to stance flipping towards the coronavirus vaccine (i.e., from pro-vaccine to anti-vaccine). Specifically, we design a social influence model where each agent has some fixed innate stance and a conviction of the stance that reflects the resistance to change;…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
