Testing Models of Stellar Structure and Evolution I. Comparison with Detached Eclipsing Binaries
Carlos del Burgo, Carlos Allende Prieto

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of the PARSEC v1.2S stellar evolution models by comparing their predictions with precise measurements from a large sample of detached eclipsing binaries, using a Bayesian approach to infer stellar parameters.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive Bayesian validation of the PARSEC models against observed binary data across various stellar evolutionary stages, highlighting areas for model improvement.
Findings
Masses are accurately inferred for main-sequence and core-helium-burning stars.
Distances and ages derived show excellent agreement with literature estimates.
Uncertainties vary from 4% for main-sequence to 24% for early AGB stars.
Abstract
We present the results of an analysis aimed at testing the accuracy and precision of the PARSEC v1.2S library of stellar evolution models, in a Bayesian framework, to infer stellar parameters. We mainly employ the online DEBCat catalogue by Southworth, a compilation of detached eclipsing binary systems with published measurements of masses and radii to 2 per cent precision. We select a sample of 318 binary components, with masses between 0.10 and 14.5 Msun, at distances between 1.3 pc and ~ 8 kpc for Galactic objects and ~ 44-68 kpc for extragalactic ones. The Bayesian analysis applied takes as input effective temperature, radius, and [Fe/H], and their uncertainties, returning theoretical predictions for other stellar parameters. From the comparison with dynamical masses, we conclude that the inferred masses are precisely derived for stars on the main-sequence and in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
