TL;DR
This paper establishes the mathematical basis for edge-centric brain connectivity analysis, critiques existing methods, and emphasizes the importance of dynamic measures over static null models in neuroimaging studies.
Contribution
It provides a mathematical framework for edge-centric analysis, critiques current approaches, and demonstrates the significance of temporal dynamics in brain connectivity.
Findings
High-amplitude cofluctuations drive node functional connectivity.
Most variation in edge FC can be explained by nFC.
Dynamic measures reveal temporal structure not captured by static models.
Abstract
Edge time series are increasingly used in brain functional imaging to study the node functional connectivity (nFC) dynamics at the finest temporal resolution while avoiding sliding windows. Here, we lay the mathematical foundations for the edge-centric analysis of neuroimaging time series, explaining why a few high-amplitude cofluctuations drive the nFC across datasets. Our exposition also constitutes a critique of the existing edge-centric studies, showing that their main findings can be derived from the nFC under a static null hypothesis that disregards temporal correlations. Testing the analytic predictions on functional MRI data from the Human Connectome Project confirms that the nFC can explain most variation in the edge FC matrix, the edge communities, the large cofluctuations, and the corresponding spatial patterns. We encourage the use of dynamic measures in future research,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
