Perspective: Reproducible Coherence Characterization of Superconducting Quantum Devices
Corey Rae H McRae, Gregory M Stiehl, Haozhi Wang, Sheng-Xiang Lin,, Shane A Caldwell, David P Pappas, Josh Mutus, Joshua Combes

TL;DR
This paper discusses the importance of accurate, reproducible performance metrics for superconducting quantum devices to enable effective optimization and comparison across labs, highlighting current challenges and future research needs.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of error analysis in superconducting quantum circuits and outlines future directions for improving reproducibility and device optimization.
Findings
Current error analysis methods are insufficient for accurate device comparison
Reproducibility issues hinder large-scale quantum device optimization
Future research is needed to standardize performance metrics
Abstract
As the field of superconducting quantum computing approaches maturity, optimization of single-device performance is proving to be a promising avenue towards large-scale quantum computers. However, this optimization is possible only if performance metrics can be accurately compared among measurements, devices, and laboratories. Currently such comparisons are inaccurate or impossible due to understudied errors from a plethora of sources. In this Perspective, we outline the current state of error analysis for qubits and resonators in superconducting quantum circuits, and discuss what future investigations are required before superconducting quantum device optimization can be realized.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
