Influence of the bus waveguide on the linear and nonlinear response of a taiji microresonator

TL;DR

This paper investigates how the bus waveguide influences the linear and nonlinear behavior of a taiji microresonator, revealing the roles of Fabry-Perot oscillations and asymmetric losses in breaking Lorentz reciprocity at high powers.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive analysis of the bus waveguide's impact on the nonlinear response of the taiji microresonator, including experimental, analytical, and numerical insights.

Findings

FPOs can cancel unidirectional behavior at low powers.

Asymmetric losses and FPOs affect energy distribution at high powers.

BW properties can induce Lorentz reciprocity violation.

Abstract

We study the linear and nonlinear response of a unidirectional reflector where a nonlinear breaking of the Lorentz reciprocity is observed. The device under test consists of a racetrack microresonator, with an embedded S-shaped waveguide, coupled to an external bus waveguide (BW). This geometry of the microresonator, known as "taiji" microresonator (TJMR), allows to selectively couple counter-propagating modes depending on the propagation direction of the incident light and, at the nonlinear level, leads to an effective breaking of Lorentz reciprocity. Here, we show that a full description of the device needs to consider also the role of the BW, which introduces (i) Fabry-Perot oscillations (FPOs) due to reflections at its facets, and (ii) asymmetric losses, which depend on the actual position of the TJMR. At sufficiently low powers the asymmetric loss does not affect the unidirectional behavior, but the FP interference fringes can cancel the effect of the S-shaped waveguide. However, at high input power, both the asymmetric loss and the FPOs contribute to the redistribution of the energy between the clockwise and counterclockwise modes within the TJMR. This strongly modifies the nonlinear response, giving rise to counter-intuitive features where, due to the FP effect and the asymmetric losses, the BW properties can determine the violation of the Lorentz reciprocity and, in particular, the difference between the transmittance in the two directions of excitation. The experimental results are explained by using an analytical model based on the transfer matrix approach, a numerical finite-element model and exploiting intuitive interference diagrams.