TL;DR
This paper systematically compares eight statistical and machine learning methods for probabilistic wind gust forecasting from ensemble predictions, demonstrating that neural networks with additional meteorological predictors significantly outperform traditional techniques.
Contribution
The study introduces a flexible neural network framework for wind gust postprocessing that outperforms existing methods and captures physical atmospheric relations.
Findings
All methods produce calibrated forecasts correcting systematic errors.
Adding meteorological predictors improves forecast skill.
Neural networks outperform benchmark methods and learn physical relations.
Abstract
Postprocessing ensemble weather predictions to correct systematic errors has become a standard practice in research and operations. However, only few recent studies have focused on ensemble postprocessing of wind gust forecasts, despite its importance for severe weather warnings. Here, we provide a comprehensive review and systematic comparison of eight statistical and machine learning methods for probabilistic wind gust forecasting via ensemble postprocessing, that can be divided in three groups: State of the art postprocessing techniques from statistics (ensemble model output statistics (EMOS), member-by-member postprocessing, isotonic distributional regression), established machine learning methods (gradient-boosting extended EMOS, quantile regression forests) and neural network-based approaches (distributional regression network, Bernstein quantile network, histogram estimation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Methodstravel james
