Search for the chiral magnetic effect via charge-dependent azimuthal correlations relative to spectator and participant planes in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV
STAR Collaboration: M. S. Abdallah, J. Adam, L. Adamczyk, J. R. Adams,, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, I. Aggarwal, M. M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, I., Alekseev, D. M. Anderson, A. Aparin, E. C. Aschenauer, M. U. Ashraf, F. G., Atetalla, A. Attri, G. S. Averichev, V. Bairathi

TL;DR
This study investigates the presence of the chiral magnetic effect in gold-gold collisions at 200 GeV by analyzing charge-dependent azimuthal correlations relative to spectator and participant planes, finding potential signals in mid-central collisions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel measurement approach distinguishing CME signals from background by comparing correlations relative to different collision planes.
Findings
Charge separation consistent with zero in peripheral collisions.
Possible CME signals observed in mid-central collisions.
Residual background effects may influence results.
Abstract
The chiral magnetic effect (CME) refers to charge separation along a strong magnetic field due to imbalanced chirality of quarks in local parity and charge-parity violating domains in quantum chromodynamics. The experimental measurement of the charge separation is made difficult by the presence of a major background from elliptic azimuthal anisotropy. This background and the CME signal have different sensitivities to the spectator and participant planes, and could thus be determined by measurements with respect to these planes. We report such measurements in Au+Au collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of 200 GeV at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider. It is found that the charge separation, with the flow background removed, is consistent with zero in peripheral (large impact parameter) collisions. Some indication of finite CME signals is seen in mid-central (intermediate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
