Comment on "Steady-State Coherences by Composite System-Bath Interactions"
Marco Cattaneo, Gonzalo Manzano

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent study claiming steady-state coherence generation via a thermal bath, highlighting technical errors and limitations in the original analysis that challenge its conclusions.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis identifying flaws in the methodology and conceptual understanding of the original work on steady-state coherences.
Findings
Identifies technical errors in the original calculations.
Highlights issues with negativity in the master equation used.
Challenges the validity of the original conclusions.
Abstract
In a recent Letter, Guarnieri et al. [1] reported on the possibility of generating steady-state coherence (SSC) in the energy basis of a two-level system by the sole action of a single thermal bath also for weak system-bath coupling and due to a composite form of this interaction. The results are based on a time-local Bloch-Redfield master equation without secular approximation and the associated set of Bloch equations, all derived in the Supplemental Material (SM) of Ref. [1]. We comment that the results reported by the authors present both technical flaws and conceptual limitations that substantially impact some of their main conclusions. Our objections mainly concern (a) technical errors in the calculation of SSC (Eqs.(2)-(4) in [1]) and (b) negativity issues associated with the weak-coupling master equation employed by the authors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography
