Understanding the relationship between visual-angle and eye-angle for reliable determination of the field-of-view in ultra-wide field fundus photography
Xincheng Yao, Devrim Toslak, Taeyoon Son, Jiechao Ma

TL;DR
This paper systematically derives the relationship between visual-angle and eye-angle in ultra-wide field fundus photography, providing conversion ratios and a table for reliable FOV assessment in clinical and instrumentation contexts.
Contribution
It introduces a quantitative analysis of the relationship between visual-angle and eye-angle, including a conversion table for accurate FOV determination in wide field fundus imaging.
Findings
Conversion ratio varies non-linearly from center to periphery.
Angular and retinal conversion ratios differ by approximately 1.51-fold at certain regions.
A comprehensive conversion table is provided for practical use.
Abstract
Abstract: Visual-angle has been used as the conventional unit to determine the field-of-view (FOV) in traditional fundus photography. Recently emerging usage of eye-angle as the unit in wide field fundus photography creates confusions about FOV interpretation in instrumentation design and clinical application. This study is to systematically derive the relationship between the visual-angle {\theta}v and eye-angle {\theta}e, and thus to enable reliable determination of the FOV in wide field fundus photography. FOV conversion ratio {\theta}e/{\theta}v, angular conversion ratio {\Delta}{\theta}e/{\Delta}{\theta}v, retinal conversion ratio {\Delta}d/{\Delta}{\theta}v, retinal distance and area are quantitatively evaluated. Systematical analysis indicates that reliable conversion between the {\theta}v and {\theta}e requires determined nodal point and spherical radius of the eye; and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
