The XXL Survey: XLIII. The quasar radio loudness dichotomy exposed via radio luminosity functions obtained by combining results from COSMOS and XXL-S X-ray selected quasars
Lana Ceraj, Vernesa Smol\v{c}i\'c, Ivan Delvecchio, Andrew Butler,, Kre\v{s}imir Tisani\'c, Jacinta Delhaize, Cathy Horellou, Jeyhan Kartaltepe,, Konstantinos Kolokythas, Sarah Leslie, Stefano Marchesi, Mladen Novak,, Marguerite Pierre, Manolis Plionis, Eleni Vardoulaki

TL;DR
This study analyzes radio and X-ray selected quasars to understand their radio loudness dichotomy, revealing that star formation and AGN activity dominate different luminosity regimes and evolve with redshift.
Contribution
It provides the first combined radio luminosity functions of X-ray quasars across multiple redshifts, disentangling star formation and AGN contributions to radio emission.
Findings
Star formation dominates low-luminosity radio emission in XQSOs.
AGN activity dominates high-luminosity radio emission.
Radio luminosity function evolves with redshift, reflecting host galaxy evolution.
Abstract
We studied a sample of 274 radio and X-ray selected quasars (XQSOs) detected in the COSMOS and XXL-S radio surveys at 3 GHz and 2.1 GHz, respectively. This sample was identified by adopting a conservative threshold in X-ray luminosity, Lx [2-10\ keV] >= 10^44 erg/s, selecting only the most powerful quasars. Using available multiwavelength data, we examined various criteria for the selection of radio-loud (RL) and radio-quiet (RQ) XQSOs, finding that the number of RL/RQ XQSOs changes significantly depending on the chosen criterion. This discrepancy arises due to the different criteria tracing different physical processes and due to our sample being selected from flux-limited radio and X-ray surveys. Another approach to study the origin of radio emission in XQSOs is via their radio luminosity function (RLF). We constructed the XQSO 1.4 GHz radio luminosity functions (RLFs) in six redshift…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
