To Raise or Not To Raise: The Autonomous Learning Rate Question
Xiaomeng Dong, Tao Tan, Michael Potter, Yun-Chan Tsai, Gaurav Kumar,, V. Ratna Saripalli, Theodore Trafalis

TL;DR
This paper introduces an Autonomous Learning Rate Controller that dynamically adjusts the learning rate during training, reducing the need for manual tuning and improving robustness across different models and datasets.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel autonomous controller for learning rate adjustment, addressing the challenge of manual tuning and sensitivity to training conditions.
Findings
Reduces manual effort in selecting learning rates
Improves training robustness across architectures and datasets
Achieves competitive or better performance with adaptive learning rates
Abstract
There is a parameter ubiquitous throughout the deep learning world: learning rate. There is likewise a ubiquitous question: what should that learning rate be? The true answer to this question is often tedious and time consuming to obtain, and a great deal of arcane knowledge has accumulated in recent years over how to pick and modify learning rates to achieve optimal training performance. Moreover, the long hours spent carefully crafting the perfect learning rate can come to nothing the moment your network architecture, optimizer, dataset, or initial conditions change ever so slightly. But it need not be this way. We propose a new answer to the great learning rate question: the Autonomous Learning Rate Controller. Find it at https://github.com/fastestimator/ARC/tree/v2.0
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Advanced Neural Network Applications · Machine Learning and Data Classification
