
TL;DR
This paper explores complex behaviors of the inner mantle hierarchy at the first limit stage, revealing that the $oldsymbol{ extomega}$-th inner mantle can be non-definable or fail to satisfy the Axiom of Choice, answering open questions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the $oldsymbol{ extomega}$-th inner mantle can be non-definable or violate AC, providing new insights into the structure of inner models.
Findings
The $oldsymbol{ extomega}$-th inner mantle can be non-definable.
The $oldsymbol{ extomega}$-th inner mantle can be definable but fail AC.
Answers open questions by Fuchs, Hamkins, and Reitz.
Abstract
This article investigates pathological behavior at the first limit stage in the sequence of inner mantles, obtained by iterating the definition of the mantle to get smaller and smaller inner models. I show: (A) it is possible that the -th inner mantle is not a definable class; and (B) it is possible that the -th inner mantle is a definable class but does not satisfy . This answers a pair of questions of Fuchs, Hamkins, and Reitz [FHR15].
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
