Some combinatorial properties of splitting trees
Jonathan Schilhan

TL;DR
This paper investigates the combinatorial properties of splitting trees, demonstrating the absence of the weak Sacks property in splitting forcing, analyzing partition results, and determining cardinal invariants after specific forcing iterations.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the behavior of splitting forcing, including the absence of the weak Sacks property and the effects on cardinal invariants after iterations.
Findings
Splitting forcing lacks the weak Sacks property below any condition.
Partition results for splitting trees can hold or fail depending on circumstances.
Cardinal invariants are determined after an $oldsymbol{ extomega_2}$-length countable support iteration.
Abstract
We show that splitting forcing does not have the weak Sacks property below any condition, answering a question of Laguzzi, Mildenberger and Stuber-Rousselle. We also show how some partition results for splitting trees hold or fail and we determine the value of cardinal invariants after an -length countable support iteration of splitting forcing.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Limits and Structures in Graph Theory
