On two approaches to the third-order solution of surface gravity waves
Zhe Gao, Z.C Sun, S.X Liang

TL;DR
This paper compares two third-order analytical solutions for surface gravity waves in finite water depth, demonstrating the advantages of the Hamiltonian approach over perturbation methods in accuracy and handling resonances.
Contribution
It introduces and compares perturbation and Hamiltonian solutions for third-order surface gravity waves, highlighting the Hamiltonian method's ability to overcome perturbation limitations.
Findings
Hamiltonian solutions are more accurate and handle resonances better.
Both solutions agree up to second order, diverging at third order.
Hamiltonian approach conserves energy-related quantities.
Abstract
Third-order approximate solutions for surface gravity waves in the finite water depth are studied in the context of potential flow theory. This solution provides explicit expressions for the surface elevation, free-surface velocity potential and velocity potential. The amplitude dispersion relation is also provided. Two approaches are used to derive the third order analytical solution, resulting in two types of approximate solutions: the perturbation solution and the Hamiltonian solution. The perturbation solution is obtained by classical perturbation technique in which the time variable is expanded in multiscale to eliminate secular terms. The Hamiltonian solution is derived from the canonical transformation in the Hamiltonian theory of water waves. By comparing the two types of solutions, it is found that they are completely equivalent for the first to second order solutions and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
