Geodesic Density Regression for Correcting 4DCT Pulmonary Respiratory Motion Artifacts

TL;DR

This paper introduces a geodesic density regression algorithm that effectively corrects motion artifacts in 4DCT lung scans by estimating an artifact-free template and dense deformation fields, outperforming previous methods.

Contribution

The novel GDR algorithm improves 4DCT artifact correction by modeling tissue density changes and using artifact masks, providing more accurate and robust results than existing methods.

Findings

GDR produces sharper, more accurate lung templates.

GDR is less sensitive to data dropout than previous methods.

GDR effectively removes motion artifacts in clinical 4DCT scans.

Abstract

Pulmonary respiratory motion artifacts are common in four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) of lungs and are caused by missing, duplicated, and misaligned image data. This paper presents a geodesic density regression (GDR) algorithm to correct motion artifacts in 4DCT by correcting artifacts in one breathing phase with artifact-free data from corresponding regions of other breathing phases. The GDR algorithm estimates an artifact-free lung template image and a smooth, dense, 4D (space plus time) vector field that deforms the template image to each breathing phase to produce an artifact-free 4DCT scan. Correspondences are estimated by accounting for the local tissue density change associated with air entering and leaving the lungs, and using binary artifact masks to exclude regions with artifacts from image regression. The artifact-free lung template image is generated by mapping the artifact-free regions of each phase volume to a common reference coordinate system using the estimated correspondences and then averaging. This procedure generates a fixed view of the lung with an improved signal-to-noise ratio. The GDR algorithm was evaluated and compared to a state-of-the-art geodesic intensity regression (GIR) algorithm using simulated CT time-series and 4DCT scans with clinically observed motion artifacts. The simulation shows that the GDR algorithm has achieved significantly more accurate Jacobian images and sharper template images, and is less sensitive to data dropout than the GIR algorithm. We also demonstrate that the GDR algorithm is more effective than the GIR algorithm for removing clinically observed motion artifacts in treatment planning 4DCT scans. Our code is freely available at https://github.com/Wei-Shao-Reg/GDR.