Thakurta metric does not describe a cosmological black hole
Tomohiro Harada, Hideki Maeda, Takuma Sato

TL;DR
The paper demonstrates that the Thakurta metric, previously used to model primordial black holes, does not actually describe a black hole due to the absence of horizons and violation of energy conditions.
Contribution
It clarifies that the Thakurta metric cannot represent a cosmological black hole and corrects a misconception caused by an incorrect sign choice in prior work.
Findings
No event horizon or trapping horizon in the Thakurta metric
Violates all standard energy conditions
Does not describe a black hole in the early universe
Abstract
Recently, the Thakurta metric has been adopted as a model of primordial black holes. We show that the spacetime described by this metric has neither black-hole event horizon nor black-hole trapping horizon and involves the violation of all the standard energy conditions as a solution of the Einstein equation. Therefore, this metric does not describe a cosmological black hole in the early universe. It is pointed out that a contradictory claim by the other group stems from an incorrect choice of sign.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
