On continuous orbit equivalence rigidity for virtually cyclic group actions
Yongle Jiang

TL;DR
This paper establishes that for minimal, topologically free actions of the infinite dihedral group on compact spaces, continuous orbit equivalence implies conjugacy, but this rigidity does not hold for some other virtually cyclic groups.
Contribution
It proves a rigidity result for infinite dihedral group actions and identifies cases where this rigidity fails for other virtually cyclic groups.
Findings
Continuous orbit equivalence implies conjugacy for dihedral group actions.
Rigidity fails for certain other virtually cyclic groups.
Provides conditions distinguishing rigid from non-rigid group actions.
Abstract
We prove that for any two continuous minimal (topologically free) actions of the infinite dihedral group on an infinite compact Hausdorff space, they are continuously orbit equivalent only if they are conjugate. We also show the above fails if we replace the infinite dihedral group with certain other virtually cyclic groups, e.g. the direct product of the integer group with any non-abelian finite simple group.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
