Superconductivity of centrosymmetric and non-centrosymmetric phases in antiperovskite (Ca,Sr)Pd$_3$P
Akira Iyo, Izumi Hase, Hiroshi Fujihisa, Yoshito Gotoh, Nao Takeshita,, Shigeyuki Ishida, Hiroki Ninomiya, Yoshiyuki Yoshida, Hiroshi Eisaki, Hishiro, T. Hirose, Taichi Terashima, Kenji Kawashima

TL;DR
This study compares superconducting properties of centrosymmetric and non-centrosymmetric phases in (Ca,Sr)Pd₃P, revealing that differences in critical temperature are mainly due to variations in electronic density of states rather than phonon effects or inversion symmetry.
Contribution
It provides detailed analysis of how structural phase transitions influence superconductivity in (Ca,Sr)Pd₃P, emphasizing the role of electronic density of states over phonon contributions.
Findings
CSo phase is an s-wave superconductor with moderate coupling.
Large Tc difference is not due to Debye temperature or phonons.
Tc suppression in NCSt phase is mainly due to decreased density of states.
Abstract
In the recently discovered antiperovskite phosphide (Ca,Sr)PdP, centrosymmetric (CS) and non-centrosymmetric (NCS) superconducting phases appear depending on the Sr concentration, and their transition temperatures () differ by as much as one order of magnitude. In this study, we investigated the superconducting properties and electronic band structures of CS orthorhombic (CSo) (CaSr)PdP ( = 3.5 K) and NCS tetragonal (NCSt) (CaSr)PdP ( = 0.32 K) samples with a focus on explaining their large difference. Specific heat measurements indicated that CSo (CaSr)PdP was an s-wave superconductor in a moderate-coupling regime with a 2/k value of 4.0. Low-lying phonons leading to the strong coupling in the structurally analogous SrPtP were…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
