TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that random noise features, when used in highly overparameterized models, can predict image quality as effectively as learned features, challenging assumptions about feature relevance.
Contribution
It reveals that random noise features can be sufficient for image quality prediction, emphasizing the importance of feature quantity and overparameterization.
Findings
Random noise features can predict image quality effectively.
Overparameterization is crucial for high performance.
Learned features are not always necessary for quality prediction.
Abstract
The performance of visual quality prediction models is commonly assumed to be closely tied to their ability to capture perceptually relevant image aspects. Models are thus either based on sophisticated feature extractors carefully designed from extensive domain knowledge or optimized through feature learning. In contrast to this, we find feature extractors constructed from random noise to be sufficient to learn a linear regression model whose quality predictions reach high correlations with human visual quality ratings, on par with a model with learned features. We analyze this curious result and show that besides the quality of feature extractors also their quantity plays a crucial role - with top performances only being achieved in highly overparameterized models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsLinear Regression
