TL;DR
MiDeCon introduces an unsupervised method for assessing fingerprint and minutia quality based on detection confidence, improving accuracy without requiring quality labels and outperforming existing quality assessment tools.
Contribution
It presents a novel, label-free approach to evaluate fingerprint quality through minutia detection confidence applicable to any deep learning extractor.
Findings
MiDeCon outperforms NFIQ1 and NFIQ2 in quality assessment accuracy.
The method is applicable to various deep learning minutia extractors.
Experiments on FVC 2006 show significant improvements over baselines.
Abstract
An essential factor to achieve high accuracies in fingerprint recognition systems is the quality of its samples. Previous works mainly proposed supervised solutions based on image properties that neglects the minutiae extraction process, despite that most fingerprint recognition techniques are based on detected minutiae. Consequently, a fingerprint image might be assigned a high quality even if the utilized minutia extractor produces unreliable information. In this work, we propose a novel concept of assessing minutia and fingerprint quality based on minutia detection confidence (MiDeCon). MiDeCon can be applied to an arbitrary deep learning based minutia extractor and does not require quality labels for learning. We propose using the detection reliability of the extracted minutia as its quality indicator. By combining the highest minutia qualities, MiDeCon also accurately determines…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
