Differentiator for Noisy Sampled Signals with Best Worst-Case Accuracy
Hernan Haimovich, Richard Seeber, Rodrigo Aldana-L\'opez, and David, G\'omez-Guti\'errez

TL;DR
This paper introduces an optimal causal differentiator for noisy sampled signals with bounded noise and derivatives, providing the best worst-case accuracy and requiring no tuning beyond known bounds.
Contribution
It presents a linear program-based differentiator that achieves the tightest worst-case error bounds for signals with bounded noise and second derivatives, outperforming existing methods.
Findings
Achieves the best worst-case differentiation accuracy among causal differentiators.
Provides a fixed-step method for optimal differentiation in noisy environments.
Demonstrates superior performance compared to high-gain and sliding-mode differentiators.
Abstract
This paper proposes a differentiator for sampled signals with bounded noise and bounded second derivative. It is based on a linear program derived from the available sample information and requires no further tuning beyond the noise and derivative bounds. A tight bound on the worst-case accuracy, i.e., the worst-case differentiation error, is derived, which is the best among all causal differentiators and is moreover shown to be obtained after a fixed number of sampling steps. Comparisons with the accuracy of existing high-gain and sliding-mode differentiators illustrate the obtained results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
