The impact of ionised outflows from z$\sim$2.5 quasars is not through instantaneous in-situ quenching: the evidence from ALMA and VLT/SINFONI
J. Scholtz, C.M. Harrison, D.J. Rosario, D.M. Alexander, K.K. Knudsen,, F. Stanley, Chian-Chou Chen, D. Kakkad, V. Mainieri, J. Mullaney

TL;DR
This study uses high-resolution ALMA and VLT/SINFONI observations of z~2.5 quasars to investigate whether ionised outflows cause immediate suppression of star formation, finding no direct evidence for instantaneous quenching but suggesting possible long-term effects.
Contribution
It provides combined ALMA and VLT/SINFONI data showing that outflows do not cause immediate star formation shutdown, highlighting the importance of long-term quasar activity in galaxy evolution.
Findings
High velocity outflows are present across the galaxy.
No evidence of immediate in-situ star formation quenching.
Dust-obscured star formation overlaps with outflow regions.
Abstract
We present high-resolution (2.4\,kpc) ALMA band 7 observations (rest-frame m) of three powerful z2.5 quasars (- ergs s). These targets have previously been reported as showing evidence for suppressed star formation based on cavities in the narrow H emission at the location of outflows traced with [O~{\sc iii}] emission. Here we combine the ALMA observations with a re-analysis of the VLT/SINFONI data to map the rest-frame far-infrared emission, H emission, and [O~{\sc iii}] emission. In all targets we observe high velocity [O~{\sc iii}] gas (i.e., W801000--2000\,km\,s) across the whole galaxy. We do not identify any H emission that is free from contamination from AGN-related processes; however, based on SED analyses, we show that the ALMA data contains a significant…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
