Are special biserial algebras homologically tame?
Claus Michael Ringel

TL;DR
This paper investigates the homological tameness of special biserial algebras, demonstrating that certain algebras previously thought not to be homologically tame are indeed tame, based on finitistic dimension analysis.
Contribution
The paper proves that a class of algebras previously believed to be non-tame are actually homologically tame by analyzing their finitistic dimensions.
Findings
All studied algebras are homologically tame.
Finitistic dimensions are equal and finite for these algebras.
Counterexamples to previous assertions are provided.
Abstract
Birge Huisgen-Zimmermann calls a finite dimensional algebra homologically tame provided the little and the big finitistic dimension are equal and finite. The question formulated in the title has been discussed by her in the paper "Representation-tame algebras need not be homologically tame", by looking for any at a sequence of algebras with big finitistic dimension . As we will show, also the little finitistic dimension of is r+m. It follows that contrary to her assertion, all her algebras are homologically tame.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCommutative Algebra and Its Applications · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
