Evidence against the wobbling nature of low-spin bands in $^{135}$Pr
B. F. Lv, C. M. Petrache, E. A. Lawrie, S. Guo, A. Astier, E. Dupont,, K. K. Zheng, H. J. Ong, J. G. Wang, X. H. Zhou, Z. Y. Sun, P. Greenlees, H., Badran, T. Calverley, D. M. Cox, T. Grahn, J. Hilton, R. Julin, S. Juutinen,, J. Konki, J. Pakarinen, P. Papadakis, J. Partanen

TL;DR
This study challenges the wobbling interpretation of low-spin bands in $^{135}$Pr by showing their electromagnetic transitions are predominantly magnetic, aligning instead with a quasiparticle-plus-triaxial-rotor model.
Contribution
The paper provides experimental evidence against the wobbling nature of certain nuclear bands in $^{135}$Pr, supporting a re-alignment model instead.
Findings
Transition mixing ratios indicate dominant M1 character.
Experimental data contradict wobbling band predictions.
Results align with quasiparticle-plus-triaxial-rotor model.
Abstract
The electromagnetic character of the transitions connecting the one- to zero-phonon and the two- to one-phonon wobbling bands should be dominated by an component, due to the collective motion of the entire nuclear charge. In the present work it is shown, based on combined angular correlation and linear polarization measurements, that the mixing ratios of all analyzed connecting transitions between low-lying bands in Pr interpreted as zero-, one-, and two-phonon wobbling bands, have absolute values smaller than one. This indicates predominant magnetic character, which is incompatible with the proposed wobbling nature. All experimental observables are instead in good agreement with quasiparticle-plus-triaxial-rotor model calculations, which describe the bands as resulting from a rapid re-alignment of the total angular momentum from the short to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
