Fast Radio Burst Morphology in the First CHIME/FRB Catalog
Ziggy Pleunis, Deborah C. Good, Victoria M. Kaspi, Ryan Mckinven,, Scott M. Ransom, Paul Scholz, Kevin Bandura, Mohit Bhardwaj, P. J. Boyle,, Charanjot Brar, Tomas Cassanelli, Pragya Chawla, Fengqiu (Adam) Dong,, Emmanuel Fonseca, B. M. Gaensler, Alexander Josephy

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the morphology of fast radio bursts in the CHIME/FRB catalog, identifying archetypes, instrumental biases, and differences between repeating and non-repeating sources, with implications for astrophysical applications.
Contribution
It introduces a classification of FRB morphologies, examines instrumental biases, and reveals differences in burst properties between repeating and non-repeating sources.
Findings
Identified four archetypes of FRB morphology.
Confirmed that repeating FRBs have larger widths.
Found that repeating FRBs are narrower in bandwidth.
Abstract
We present a synthesis of fast radio burst (FRB) morphology (the change in flux as a function of time and frequency) as detected in the 400-800 MHz octave by the FRB project on the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME/FRB), using events from the first CHIME/FRB catalog. The catalog consists of 61 bursts from 18 repeating sources, plus 474 one-off FRBs, detected between 2018 July 25 and 2019 July 2. We identify four observed archetypes of burst morphology ("simple broadband," "simple narrowband," "temporally complex" and "downward drifting") and describe relevant instrumental biases that are essential for interpreting the observed morphologies. Using the catalog properties of the FRBs, we confirm that bursts from repeating sources, on average, have larger widths and we show, for the first time, that bursts from repeating sources, on average, are narrower in bandwidth.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
