Insights into the Coadsorption and Reactivity of O and CO on Ru(0001) and Their Coverage Dependence

TL;DR

This study uses advanced density functional theory to analyze how oxygen and CO coadsorb on Ru(0001) surfaces at various coverages, revealing coverage-dependent reactivity and energy barriers that influence CO desorption and oxidation.

Contribution

It provides detailed insights into the coverage-dependent coadsorption and reaction pathways of CO and oxygen on Ru(0001), highlighting the energetic and mechanistic differences at various coverages.

Findings

Desorption energy decreases with increasing CO coverage.

Oxidation becomes exothermic at intermediate and high coverages.

High energy barriers favor CO desorption over oxidation.

Abstract

Using density functional theory and an exchange-correlationfunctional that includes the van der Waals interaction, we study the coadsorption of CO on Ru(0001) saturated with 0.5 ML of oxygen. Different coexisting CO coverages are considered that are experimentally motivated, the room temperaturecoverage consisting of 0.5 ML-O + 0.25 ML-CO (low coverage), the saturation coverage achieved at low temperatures (0.5 ML-O + 0.375 ML-CO, intermediate coverage), and the equally mixed monolayer that is stable according to our calculations but not experimentally observed yet (0.5 ML-O + 0.5 ML-CO, high coverage). For each coverage, we study the competition between the desorption and oxidation of CO on the corresponding optimized structure by analyzing their reaction energies and minimum energy reaction paths. The desorption process is endothermic at all coverages, although the desorption energy decreases as the CO coverage increases. The process itself (and also the reverted adsorption) becomes more involved at the intermediate and high coverages because of the appearance of a physisorption well and concomitant energy barrier separating it from the chemisorbed state. Remarkably, the oxidation of CO, which is endothermic at low coverages, turns exothermic at the intermediate and high coverages. In all cases, the minimum reaction path for oxidation, which involves the chemisorbed and physisorbed CO2, is ruled by one of the large energy barriers that protect these molecular states. Altogether, the larger activation energies for oxidation as compared to those for desorption and the extreme complexity of the oxidation against the desorption paths explain that CO desorption dominates over the oxidation in experiments.