Free versus Bound Entanglement: Machine learning tackling a NP-hard problem
Beatrix C. Hiesmayr

TL;DR
This paper uses machine learning to analyze a large family of bipartite qutrit states, revealing that bound entanglement is more common than previously thought and uncovering a low-dimensional structure in bound entangled states.
Contribution
It introduces a new family of symmetric states and applies machine learning to characterize bound entanglement, revealing a low-dimensional structure and its prevalence.
Findings
82% of states are free entangled
10% of states are bound entangled
Strong 2D linear structure in bound entangled states
Abstract
Entanglement detection in high dimensional systems is a NP-hard problem since it is lacking an efficient way. Given a bipartite quantum state of interest free entanglement can be detected efficiently by the PPT-criterion (Peres-Horodecki criterion), in contrast to detecting bound entanglement, i.e. a curious form of entanglement that can also not be distilled into maximally (free) entangled states. Only a few bound entangled states have been found, typically by constructing dedicated entanglement witnesses, so naturally the question arises how large is the volume of those states. We define a large family of magically symmetric states of bipartite qutrits for which we find to be free entangled, to be certainly separable and as much as to be bound entangled, which shows that this kind of entanglement is not rare. Via various machine learning algorithms we can confirm…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
