Early Science with the Large Millimeter Telescope: a 1.1 mm AzTEC Survey of Red-$Herschel$ dusty star-forming galaxies
A. Monta\~na, J. A. Zavala, I. Aretxaga, D. H. Hughes, R. J. Ivison,, A. Pope, D. S\'anchez-Arg\"uelles, G. W. Wilson, M. Yun, O. A. Cantua, M., McCrackan, M. J. Micha{\l}owski, E. Valiante, V. Arumugam, C. M. Casey, R., Ch\'avez, E. Col\'in-Beltr\'an, H. Dannerbauer

TL;DR
This study uses 1.1 mm observations from the Large Millimeter Telescope to analyze high-redshift dusty star-forming galaxies, revealing multiple systems, redshift distributions, and potential galaxy over-densities, contributing new spectroscopic redshifts and photometric data.
Contribution
First large-scale 1.1 mm survey of Herschel-selected high-redshift galaxies, providing new insights into their multiplicity, redshift distribution, and physical associations.
Findings
At least 9% of targets are multiple systems.
Approximately 85% of sources are at z > 3.
Detected new spectroscopic redshifts at z = 3.85-6.03.
Abstract
We present LMT/AzTEC 1.1mm observations of luminous high-redshift dusty star-forming galaxy candidates from the sq.deg -ATLAS survey, selected on the basis of their SPIRE red far-infrared colours and with mJy. With an effective arcsec angular resolution, our observations reveal that at least 9 per cent of the targets break into multiple systems with SNR members. The fraction of multiple systems increases to per cent (or more) if some non-detected targets are considered multiples, as suggested by the data. Combining the new AzTEC and deblended photometry we derive photometric redshifts, IR luminosities, and star formation rates. While the median redshifts of the multiple and single systems are similar , the redshift distribution of the latter is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
