Understanding and Improving Fairness-Accuracy Trade-offs in Multi-Task Learning
Yuyan Wang, Xuezhi Wang, Alex Beutel, Flavien Prost, Jilin Chen, Ed H., Chi

TL;DR
This paper explores the complex interactions between fairness and accuracy in multi-task learning, highlighting the limitations of traditional methods and proposing new metrics and an approach to enhance fairness across multiple tasks.
Contribution
It introduces a novel set of metrics and a Multi-Task-Aware Fairness (MTA-F) approach to better balance fairness and accuracy in multi-task learning scenarios.
Findings
Traditional accuracy-focused methods may not optimize fairness effectively.
Proposed metrics better capture multi-dimensional fairness-accuracy trade-offs.
MTA-F approach improves fairness outcomes in real-world datasets.
Abstract
As multi-task models gain popularity in a wider range of machine learning applications, it is becoming increasingly important for practitioners to understand the fairness implications associated with those models. Most existing fairness literature focuses on learning a single task more fairly, while how ML fairness interacts with multiple tasks in the joint learning setting is largely under-explored. In this paper, we are concerned with how group fairness (e.g., equal opportunity, equalized odds) as an ML fairness concept plays out in the multi-task scenario. In multi-task learning, several tasks are learned jointly to exploit task correlations for a more efficient inductive transfer. This presents a multi-dimensional Pareto frontier on (1) the trade-off between group fairness and accuracy with respect to each task, as well as (2) the trade-offs across multiple tasks. We aim to provide…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
