The absence of superconductivity in the next-to-leading order Ginzburg-Landau functional for Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer superconductor
Filipp N. Rybakov, Egor Babaev

TL;DR
This paper proves that the next-to-leading order Ginzburg-Landau functional derived from BCS theory does not have solutions representing superconducting states, challenging previous assumptions about its physical relevance.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the extended Ginzburg-Landau functional at next-to-leading order does not serve as a free energy with minima, contradicting prior claims.
Findings
Extended GL functional lacks solutions as minima.
Cannot be used to describe superconducting states.
Challenges previous assumptions about the functional's validity.
Abstract
Shortly after the Gor'kov microscopic derivation of the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) model via a small order parameter expansion in Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory of superconductivity, the derivation was carried to next-to-leading order in that parameter and its spatial derivatives. The aim was to obtain a generalized GL free energy that approximates the microscopic model better. Since 1960s, multiple works have claimed or implicitly assumed that this extended GL model corresponds to the free energy and has solutions in the form of local minima describing superconductivity, such as vortex solutions. In contrast to this, we prove that this extended GL functional does not represent free energy since it does not have any solutions in the form of minima. Accordingly, it cannot be used to describe superconducting states.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
