Zeta and Fredholm determinants of self-adjoint operators
Luiz Hartmann, Matthias Lesch

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between zeta-regularized and Fredholm determinants for self-adjoint operators, providing formulas and criteria that connect these concepts through heat trace coefficients and spectral assumptions.
Contribution
It derives a formula linking zeta and Fredholm determinants of self-adjoint operators and offers criteria involving heat trace coefficients for their equivalence.
Findings
Derived a formula relating zeta and Fredholm determinants.
Expressed derivatives of zeta determinants in terms of heat trace coefficients.
Provided criteria ensuring the equivalence of determinants for elliptic operators.
Abstract
Let be a self-adjoint invertible operator in a Hilbert space such that is -summable. Under a certain discrete dimension spectrum assumption on , we study the relation between the (regularized) Fredholm determinant, , on the one hand and the zeta regularized determinant, , on the other. One of the main results is the formula \begin{equation*} \frac{\det_{\zeta} (L + z)}{\det_{\zeta} (L)} = \exp \left( \sum_{j=1}^{p-1} \frac{z^j}{j!} \cdot \frac{d^j}{dz^j} \log \det\nolimits_{\zeta} (L+z) |_{z=0} \right) \cdot \det\nolimits_{p}(I + z \cdot L^{-1} ). \end{equation*} We show that the derivatives can be expressed in terms of (regularized) zeta values and heat trace coefficients of . Furthermore, we give a general criterion in terms of the heat trace…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
