From Neutrino- to Photon-Cooled in Three Years: Can Fallback Accretion Explain the X-ray Excess in GW170817?
Brian D. Metzger, Rodrigo Fernandez

TL;DR
This paper investigates the late-time X-ray excess in GW170817, proposing fallback accretion from disk wind ejecta as a viable explanation, supported by hydrodynamic simulations showing a gradual decay of fallback rate leading to observable X-ray luminosity.
Contribution
The study introduces long-timescale hydrodynamic simulations of post-merger disk evolution, demonstrating fallback accretion as a plausible source of the X-ray excess in GW170817.
Findings
Fallback accretion rate decays as t^(-1.43 to -1.66)
Late-time accretion luminosity matches observed X-ray excess
Efficient photon cooling resumes accretion after neutrino cooling becomes ineffective
Abstract
An excess in the X-ray emission from the neutron star merger GW170817 above the predicted afterglow was recently detected t~3.4 years post-merger. One possible origin for the excess is accretion onto the newly unshrouded black hole (BH) remnant. While fall-back of the bound dynamical ejecta is insufficient to generate the excess luminosity, L_X ~ 5e38 erg/s, fall-back from the disk wind ejecta-due to their larger mass and lower velocity-remains a viable possibility. We present hydrodynamic alpha-viscosity simulations of the post-merger disk evolution which extend to an unprecedently long timescale t ~ 35 s post-merger, as necessary to capture the end of photodissociation and the asymptotic evolution into the radiatively inefficient regime. Due to inefficient neutrino cooling, the BH accretion rate decays rapidly at late times (Mdot_BH ~ t^(-\beta_BH), where \beta_BH ~ 2.4-2.8),…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
