TL;DR
This paper reviews experimental methods for measuring mixing and $CP$ violation in $D^0 o K^- \pi^+$ decays, highlighting biases and sensitivities, and proposing approaches to improve phase measurements in charm meson decays.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of biases in current measurements and estimates the sensitivity of untagged $D^0$ decays to weak mixing phases, offering new insights into $CP$ violation studies.
Findings
Bias in $y_{CP}$ measurement can be around 40% of current precision.
Untagged $D^0$ decays can measure weak phases without decay amplitude nuisance.
Sensitivity to weak phases is lower by a factor of six compared to other channels.
Abstract
We review the experimental methods to measure mixing and time-dependent violation in decays into two hadrons. While these phenomena are usually neglected for decays, this approximation is not always justified. In particular, it produces a bias on the measurement of the parameter , when this is performed by relying on decays as a normalisation channel, whose size is around 40% of the precision of the current world average. Finally, we estimate the sensitivity to the weak mixing phases achievable by studying and untagged decays, where stands for either of the and mesons. Contrary to Cabibbo-suppressed decays, these decay channels allow to measure these phases without final-state dependent nuisance contributions from the decay amplitudes, but their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
